
The thread under your announcement
You posted it; the comments took over. Find out whether it's fading or building, and whether a reply from you helps.
A thread about your organization. Comments piling up under an announcement. A review other people started arguing about. Presaga Pulse reads the actual conversation, finds where else it lives, plays it forward, and tests stepping in against staying out — then keeps reading as it moves, and scores its own calls.
You paste a link to the conversation. Pulse reads what's actually there, works out where it's going, and tells you whether saying something would calm it down or pour fuel on it — then checks its own answer as the conversation keeps going.
You can see what people said. You can't see where it's going — whether the thread burns out on its own or turns into the thing you spend next week explaining. Pulse builds a population from the people actually in the conversation, plays it forward, and tells you which arguments are gaining ground, who is carrying them, and what happens next.
Then it does the thing no monitoring tool can: it tests your options. A Pulse briefing runs stay out and step in as two separate arms on the same conversation, and tells you what each one costs. Silence is a real recommendation here, and every report says what silence costs as well as what speaking costs.
An illustrative Pulse briefing — the input a town's communications lead would give, and the shape of the call that comes back.
A link to the local paper's story on the new downtown parking bylaw — 140 comments in two days, three residents doing most of the talking, a councillor named twice, and no reply from the town yet. “Do we respond, and does responding make it worse?”
Stay out for now. The thread is plateauing on its own: three of the four arguments gaining ground are about the bylaw's timing, not its substance, and the two voices carrying it have drawn no new participants in a day and a half. A reply from the town re-opens it. If the named councillor is drawn in, step in within the day with a facts-only correction — a reply we tested separately, against staying out.
Written for the person deciding whether to reply — the call first, then everything it rests on, then what changed since last time.
Pulse's reviewers read for direction, not just sentiment — and one seat's whole job is to make the case for staying out.
Pulse keeps a running model of the conversation — the narratives present and their share, which are growing or fading, the claims circulating and where each was first seen, the actors, the venues, where disagreement concentrates, and which groups are absent. Every field is counted, cited, and dated.
Point Pulse at the link. It reads the public page the way any visitor would — never posting, never logging in, never going behind a login or a paywall — stamps when it read it, and records what was there so your report can cite the words that were publicly visible at the time.
Pulse sweeps for the other places the same conversation is happening — the subreddit, the local news comments, the forum you didn't know about — and maps them, including the venues it found but could not read.
Staying out and stepping in run as two arms on the same conversation. The report says what each one changes and what each one costs.
On the cadence you choose, Pulse re-reads the conversation. What changed since the last reading is the first thing the new report says — and last reading's dated projections are marked right or wrong.
A social listening tool counts and classifies the posts that already exist. An agency sends a morning digest. Then someone in the room guesses whether replying helps — and finds out by replying.
Pulse reads the conversation, plays it forward, and tests your reply — and your silence — against the specific people in it. Then it keeps reading, and keeps score.
Industry estimates from published sources; see Compare for every figure and where it came from.

You posted it; the comments took over. Find out whether it's fading or building, and whether a reply from you helps.

A customer's post is being shared. See which version of the story is winning and where intervention would actually land.

A heated community thread on a bylaw, a budget, a development. Learn which positions are gaining support and where consensus might form.

You changed a price, a policy, a name. Watch the response unfold with a reading every day, each one scored against the last.

It looks small today. Pulse tells you whether it stays small — and what would make it not.

No artifact, no decision yet — just a question: how is the public talking about this, and where? Pulse finds the conversation and reads it.
Every name, description and price below is read from the same catalog the app bills from, at the moment you load this page. Change a product in the back office and this page changes with it.